AlOx/LiF composite protection layer for Cr-doped (Bi,Sb)2Te3 quantum anomalous Hall films
Ou Yunbo1, Feng Yang2, Feng Xiao1, 2, Hao Zhenqi2, Zhang Liguo2, Liu Chang2, Wang Yayu2, †, , He Ke2, ‡, , Ma Xucun2, Xue Qikun2
Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
State Key Laboratory of Low Dimensional Quantum Physics, Department of Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: yayuwang@tsinghua.edu.cn

‡ Corresponding author. E-mail: kehe@tsinghua.edu.cn

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11325421).

Abstract
Abstract

We have realized robust quantum anomalous Hall samples by protecting Cr-doped (Bi,Sb)2Te3 topological insulator films with a combination of LiF and AlOx capping layers. The AlOx/LiF composite capping layer well keeps the quantum anomalous Hall states of Cr-doped (Bi,Sb)2Te3 films and effectively prevent them from degradation induced by ambient conditions. The progress is a key step towards the realization of the quantum phenomena in heterostructures and devices based on quantum anomalous Hall system.

1. Introduction

A topological insulator (TI) is an insulator with topologically protected gapless surface states in its bulk gap.[14] This class of materials has received extensive research interests in the past decade for a number of novel quantum phenomena predicted in them.[514] The quantum anomalous Hall effect (QAHE), a quantum Hall effect that can occur without external magnetic field, is among the few quantum phenomena that have been experimentally observed.[1517] The effect is expected to appear in a TI film with its time-reversal symmetry broken by ferromagnetism, introduced via magnetic doping or proximity.[57,10,18] The QAHE was experimentally realized in magnetically doped (Bi,Sb)2Te3 three-dimensional (3D) TI films grown by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE), opening a path toward the observation of many other exotic quantum effects such as topological magnetoeletric effect.[911] and chiral topological superconductivity.[13,14]

The magnetically gapped topological surface states play a key role in QAHE in magnetic 3D TI films.[19] Hence QAHE is sensitive to the surface conditions of the films. QAHE was first observed in Cr-doped (Bi,Sb)2Te3 films with no capping layer.[15] Such bare magnetic TI films cannot hold the QAH property in atmosphere for a long period of time (usually less than one month even in inert atmosphere) and in some microfabrication processes such as electron beam lithography (EBL) and atomic layer deposition (ALD). This greatly impedes studies and applications of QAH-based structures and devices. It is highly desired to find a satisfactory capping layer material capable of preserving the native properties of QAH films and effectively protecting them from degradation under various conditions.

We have tried to protect Cr-doped (Bi,Sb)2Te3 QAH films by depositing a layer of tellurium on them. Tellurium atoms form a single-crystalline film covering the whole surface of the films,[20] but destroying the QAHE in them. Figures 1(a) and 1(b) show the magnetic field (H) dependencies of the Hall resistance (ρyx) and the longitudinal resistance (ρxx) of bare (green lines) and a Te-capped (blue lines) Cr0.15(Bi0.1Sb0.9)1.85Te3 films measured at 25 mK, respectively. The bare sample clearly shows the QAHE with its ρyx up to h/e2 and ρxx down to zero. But in the Te-capped film, both ρyx and ρxx significantly deviate from the quantized values. The disappearance of the QAHE may be caused by parallel conduction channels brought about by the Te capping layer. Kou et al. in situ deposited an Al layer of ∼ 1 nm on Cr-doped (Bi,Sb)2Te3 films; the Al layer is oxidized by air into a compact insulating AlOx film which acts as a capping layer for the underlying magnetic TI film. Although the QAHE is observed in such AlOx-covered Cr-doped (Bi,Sb)2Te3 films, the preparation process of AlOx layer is difficult to control. The coverage of the deposited Al should be carefully chosen to guarantee that it is neither too thick to be completely oxidized by air nor too thin to protect the film. Besides, the fact that Al electronegativity is much lower than that of Sb and Bi makes Al atoms easily react with the films and modify their properties.

Fig. 1. Magnetic field dependence of (a) ρyx and (b) ρxx for bare (green lines) and Te-capped (blue lines) 5 QL Cr0.15(Bi0.1Sb0.9)1.85Te3 films at 25 mK. The measurement is taken at the CNPs of bare (−6 V) and Te-capped (−32 V) films.

Lithium fluoride is an insulator with rocksalt structure (a = 4.026 Å) and a gap of 12.6 eV.[21] The small lattice constant and the big difference between the electro-negativities of Li and F make the compound resistant to diffusion and reaction with atoms in the atmosphere and adjacent layers. So it is a good candidate material for a capping layer of QAH samples. In this study, we investigated the influence of LiF capping layer on the QAHE of Cr-doped (Bi,Sb)2Te3 films and found that LiF can make an ideal protection layer for the QAH films if covered with a layer of water-resistant AlOx.

2. Experimental details

The QAH samples used in this study are 5-QL thick Cr0.15(Bi0.1Sb0.9)1.85Te3 films prepared on SrTiO3 (111) substrates with MBE. The films were grown in an ultra-high vacuum chamber (base pressure < 1.0 × 10−10 mbar, 1 bar = 105 Pa) equipped with a reflective high energy electron diffraction (RHEED) facility. Lithium fluoride and Al were prepared by thermal evaporation of LiF powder and Al granules with home-made evaporators, respectively. The QAH films were kept at room temperature for LiF and Al deposition. The transport properties of the films were measured with standard ac lock-in methods. Strontium titanate substrates were used as the dielectric layer of the bottom gate to tune the chemical potential of the films.[22,23]

3. Results and discussion

Figure 2(a) shows the RHEED pattern and atomic force microscope (AFM) map of a bare Cr0.15(Bi0.1Sb0.9)1.85Te3 film, which exhibits the typical 1 × 1 RHEED diffraction streaks and step-terrace morphology as shown before.[15] After depositing ∼ 5-nm thick LiF on the film, the 1 × 1 streaks disappear, and diffraction spots resulting from electron transmission through 3D islands with the same crystalline orientation are observed (Fig. 2(b) top).

Fig. 2. (a)–(c) The RHEED pattern (top panels) and 1 μm × 1 μm AFM images (bottom panels) of (a) bare, (b) 5-nm LiF capped, and (c) 40-nm LiF capped 5 QL Cr0.15(Bi0.1Sb0.9)1.85Te3 film. The yellow curves in the AFM images are the line profiles of the AFM images indicated by the green dash lines.

We can also observe diffraction circles indicating existence of islands with different crystalline orientations. With increasing thickness of LiF, the transmission spots gradually disappear, and eventually only the diffraction circles remain (Fig. 2(c) top), which implies a random distribution of crystalline orientation of LiF islands. The AFM images (Figs. 2(b) bottom and 2(c) bottom) indeed exhibit the morphology of 3D islands, consistent with the RHEED observation. The roughness of the surface is ∼ 3.26 nm and ∼ 10.73 nm when the average thickness of LiF is 5 nm and 40 nm, respectively. Therefore, the Cr-doped (Bi,Sb)2Te3 film is completely covered by LiF layer in spite of the 3D morphology. This implies that LiF film grows in the Stranski–Krastanov mode on Cr-doped (Bi,Sb)2Te3.

In Figs. 3(a) and 3(b) we display the H dependencies of ρyx and ρxx, respectively, of a bare 5-QL Cr0.15(Bi0.1Sb0.9)1.85Te3 film (green lines) and a film grown under exactly the same conditions but capped with a 40-nm thick LiF (blue lines). The data were taken at 1.5 K. For both of the samples, Vg is tuned to obtain the maximum ρyx, i.e., at the charge-neutral point (CNP).[15,18] We can see that the Hall traces (ρyxH curves) of these two samples basically coincide, and ρyx reaches 0.75h/e2 at 0.3 T. Such a high ρyx at 1.5 K means that it will reach the quantized Hall plateau at 30 mK.[15] The magnetoresistance (ρxxH) curve of the capped film is even a little smaller than that of the bare film, which means better sample quality. Thus LiF capping layer is not detrimental to the QAHE of Cr-doped (Bi,Sb)2Te3 films. From the Vg dependencies of ρyx of the two samples (Fig. 3(c)) at zero magnetic field, the CNP (ρyx maximum) of the LiF-capped film is located at Vg = 36 V, larger that of the bare film (Vg = −1 V). This suggests that the LiF capping layer dopes holes in the QAH films.

Fig. 3. Magnetic field dependence of (a) ρyx and (b) ρxx for bare (green lines) and 40-nm LiF-capped (blue lines) 5-QL Cr0.15(Bi0.1Sb0.9)1.85Te3 films with gate voltage of −1 V, 36 V. (c) Vg dependence of ρyx at zero magnetic field for bare (green line) and 40-nm LiF-capped (blue line) 5-QL Cr0.15(Bi0.1Sb0.9)1.85Te3 films. Magnetic field dependence of ρyx and ρxx (Vg = 200 V), Vg dependence of ρyx at zero magnetic field of 40-nm LiF-capped 5-QL Cr0.15(Bi0.1Sb0.9)1.85Te3 films, which is kept in argon glove box for 60 days, are shown with red lines in panels (a), (b), and (c). All the measurements are conducted at 1.5 K.

To check if an LiF capping layer can effectively protect the QAHE of Cr-doped (Bi,Sb)2Te3 films, we measured the LiF-capped Cr0.15(Bi0.1Sb0.9)1.85Te3 film after keeping it in an argon glove box for 60 days. The data are plotted with red lines in Figs. 3(a)3(c). From Fig. 3(c), we can see that the CNP is shifted to Vg = 150 V, indicating a heavily p-doping of the film. The maximum ρyx of the sample at 0.3 T is only 0.51h/e2, much lower than ρyx = 0.75h/e2 of the fresh sample, and ρxx increases significantly. These observations indicate severe degradation of the film. Hence, although LiF capping layer does not deteriorate the QAHE of Cr-doped (Bi,Sb)2Te3 films, it is unable to prevent them from aging under ambient conditions.

It is not clear why LiF cannot effectively protect the QAH films with its good chemical stability and compact lattice structure. A fact probably relevant is that LiF is slightly soluble in water (0.132 wt% at 23.7 °C).[24] Thus an LiF layer could adsorb water molecules from the atmosphere and in turn influence the properties of the underlying QAH films. Such a deficiency of LiF can be removed by capping it with a water-resistant layer such as AlOx.

We deposited 3-nm thick Al on an LiF (5 nm)-covered Cr0.15(Bi0.1Sb0.9)1.85Te3 film and had it oxidized into a compact AlOx layer in air. As shown in Fig. 4(a), the Hall trace of the film with AlOx/LiF composite capping layer (blue line) is similar to that of the bare film (green line). The maximum ρyx of the AlOx/LiF-capped film is 0.7h/e2, only slightly lower than that of the bare film (0.73h/e2), which still keeps the QAH character. ρxx of the AlOx/LiF-capped sample is smaller than the bare one (Fig. 4(b)), suggesting an improved sample quality, probably due to avoidance of the exposure of the film surface to atmosphere. After being kept in an argon glove box for 17 days, the AlOx/LiF-capped film only experiences slight difference in its ρyx and ρxx (red lines in Figs. 4(a)4(c)). Unlike the films capped only by LiF, the Vg for CNP basically remains unchanged with time. Thus the additional AlOx layer effectively protects the LiF layer and the magnetic TI film from degradation under ambient conditions.

Fig. 4. Magnetic field dependence of (a) ρyx and (b) ρxx for bare (green lines), 3-nm AlOx/5-nm LiF-capped (blue lines), and 10-nm AlOx(ALD)/0.5-nm AlOx/5-nm LiF-capped (black lines) 5-QL Cr0.15(Bi0.1Sb0.9)1.85Te3 films with gate voltage of −8 V, 40 V, and 24 V respectively. (c) Vg dependence of ρyx at zero magnetic field for bare (green line), 3-nm AlOx/5-nm LiF-capped (blue line), and 10-nm AlOx(ALD)/0.5-nm AlOx/5-nm LiF-capped (black line) 5-QL Cr0.15(Bi0.1Sb0.9)1.85Te3 films. Magnetic field dependence of ρyx and ρxx (Vg = 12 V), Vg dependence of ρyx at zero magnetic field of 3-nm AlOx/5-nm LiF-capped 5-QL Cr0.15(Bi0.1Sb0.9)1.85Te3 film, which is kept in argon glove box for 17 days, are shown with red lines in panels (a), (b), and (c). All the measurements are conducted at 1.5 K.

In order to further test the protection effect of the composite capping layer, we attempted using ALD to deposit AlOx on the AlOx/LiF-capped samples with ozone (O3) as the precursor at 70 °C for 2 hours. Such a process is a key step toward the realization of dual-gate structures and tunneling junctions based on quantum anomalous Hall films. The strong oxidation of ozone plus the elevated temperature used in ALD can easily destroy the fragile quantum anomalous Hall states of the magnetically doped (Bi,Sb)2Te3 films. The black lines in Figs. 4(a)4(c) represent the transport properties measured in the AlOx/LiF-capped film after the ALD process. Both the ρyx and ρxx, as well as the position of the CNP, show similar values as before ALD deposition, even with a little improvement (larger ρyx, smaller ρxx and smaller Vg for the CNP). The improvement probably results from annealing effect of the elevated temperature in the ALD process. This result demonstrates the excellent protection provided by AlOx/LiF-composite capping layer.

4. Conclusion

In summary, we found that a LiF capping layer can very well preserve the QAHE of Cr-doped (Bi,Sb)2Te3 films, but is unable to effectively protect them from contamination of ambient conditions. By covering the LiF surface with an AlOx layer, we significantly improved the protection effect of LiF, which enabled us to obtain robust QAH samples that survive a longer period of time and endure the harsh conditions of some microfabrication processes. The excellent performance of AlOx/LiF composite capping layer makes it useful in various studies and applications of QAHE and Bi2Se3 family TIs.

Reference
1Kane C LMele E J2005Phys. Rev. Lett.953
2Zhang H JLiu C XQi X LDai XFang ZZhang S C 2009 Nat. Phys. 5 438
3Bernevig B AHughes T LZhang S C 2006 Science 314 1757
4Chen Y LAnalytis J GChu J HLiu Z KMo S KQi X LZhang H JLu D HDai XFang ZZhang S CFisher I RHussain ZShen Z X 2009 Science 325 178
5Liu C XQi X LDai XFang ZZhang S C 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 146802
6Qi X LHughes T LZhang S C 2008 Phys. Rev. 78 195424
7He KWang YXue Q K 2013 Natl. Sci. Rev. 1 38
8Wang JLian BQi X LZhang S C 2015 Phys. Rev. 92 064520
9Morimoto TFurusaki ANagaosa N 2015 Phys. Rev. 92 085113
10Wang JLian BQi X LZhang S C 2015 Phys. Rev. 92 081107
11Qi X LZhang S C 2011 Rev. Mod. Phys. 83 1057
12Qi X LLi R DZang J DZhang S C 2009 Science 323 1184
13Beenakker C W J 2013 Ann. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 4 113
14Alicea J 2012 Rep. Prog. Phys. 75 076501
15Chang C ZZhang JFeng XShen JZhang ZGuo MLi KOu YWei PWang L LJi Z QFeng YJi SChen XJia JDai XFang ZZhang S CHe KWang YLu LMa X CXue Q K 2013 Science 340 167
16Chang C ZZhao W WKim D YZhang H JAssaf B AHeiman DZhang S CLiu C XChan M H WMoodera J S 2015 Nat. Mater. 14 473
17Mogi MYoshimi RTsukazaki AYasuda KKozuka YTakahashi K SKawasaki MTokura Y 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 107 182401
18He KMa X CChen X LWang Y YXue Q K 2013 Chin. Phys. 22 067305
19Yu RZhang WZhang H JZhang S CDai XFang Z 2010 Science 329 61
20Park JSoh Y AAeppli GFeng XOu Y BHe KXue Q K 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 11595
21Wang N PRohlfing MKruger PPollmann J2003Phys. Rev. B67
22Yang W MLin C JLiao JLi Y Q 2013 Chin. Phys. 22 097202
23Chen JQin H JYang FLiu JGuan TQu F MZhang G HShi J RXie X CYang C LWu K HLi Y Q L 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 176602
24Stubblef C BBachR O 1972 J. Chem. Eng. Data 17 491